|
|
Post by Demonic Eeyore on May 12, 2008 4:46:26 GMT -6
Has anyone looked into the fact that maybe there's a Molly Holly reason behind it? Remember, when Molly "lost" her hair it was supposed to be in support of her best friend suffering cancer.
But then again, this is TNA so.... yeah...
|
|
|
|
Post by SirRobin on May 12, 2008 4:53:49 GMT -6
No offence to Nikki, but I think it worked out better if she didn't return on the last taping, because we already had the return of Mercedes.
One special return was enough, because one would have over-shadowed the other, and now it makes us look foward to next taping even more because we'll be thinking "Is this the one where Nikki Roxx returns?"
Plus, I think people would be tired of chanting "Welcome Back" all night if on the same taping we had the return of Mercedes, Knox and Nikki. Plus we know if Nikki does return, I think her pop will be epic.
|
|
|
|
Post by nykk on May 12, 2008 5:08:24 GMT -6
You really need to go back and read old threads. It's common knowledge that Nikki signed a contract with TNA, which prevented her from working wherever TNA doesn't want her to work. As I said in the original post, I wasn't sure if it had been discussed. Not everyone reads a novel before watching a movie. I wanted Dave to answer about 4/26, which he did. She could have been there if she didn't have another booking on the same date. So much for your "common knowledge." If you're not sure if it's been discussed, that's what the search function is for. In the future, it will save you from looking like a tool for asking a question that's been answered a bunch of times already. You asked a general question about why Nikki hasn't appeared at SHIMMER, which was not addressed to Dave, and was answered in the first response, which you still expressed confusion at. Neither Ryan or I even addressed the 4/26 part of your inquiry, so chill. |
|
|
|
Post by black1negative on May 12, 2008 5:30:40 GMT -6
WHY DID THEY DO THAT TO NIKKI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by tswdm on May 12, 2008 6:41:48 GMT -6
If you're not sure if it's been discussed, that's what the search function is for. In the future, it will save you from looking like a tool for asking a question that's been answered a bunch of times already. You asked a general question about why Nikki hasn't appeared at SHIMMER, which was not addressed to Dave, and was answered in the first response, which you still expressed confusion at. Neither Ryan or I even addressed the 4/26 part of your inquiry, so chill. After the SHIMMER and TNA agreement was announced, Dave said, "We can book whomever we'd like to book" but Nikki was not booked for 4/26. shimmerwomen.proboards50.com/index.cgi?board=shimmer&action=display&thread=2026#26092I don't see any posts by him after that giving an explanation until I made a thread. In the "Who should be the next Nikki Roxx?" topic prior to the taping there are some rumblings buried in the back pages where you wrote: Ever since she went to TNA, like eight months ago. She wasn't at 15/16, so the general consensus is that she must have signed an exclusive contract and is gone. If it's such common knowledge about the specifics of her TNA agreement, then explain your wording here. "General consensus" and "must have" sound like you don't really know. That's just deductive reasoning. I'm not trying to step on your toes, but if I "look like a tool" then so do you for attacking me on a subject that you don't have definitive answers on. Do you have any other prerequisite forum posts for me to read?  |
|
|
|
Post by sonicstorm06 on May 12, 2008 8:53:45 GMT -6
You know what I hope TNA dies soon.
|
|
|
|
Post by sonicstorm06 on May 12, 2008 9:10:37 GMT -6
Lastly, the women's match. I will admit here that I was marking out hugely for Roxxi, and I'm afraid that may have tainted my opinion somewhat, but I still think my logic is strong on this one. So we get this last-second stip that if Gail loses, the last person eliminated (Angelina) will be the one to get her head shaved (bully for TNA for sticking with a gimmick...I think). Fine, I can live with that. However, we have essentially a no DQ ladder match (awesome btw, Roxxi gets all the props in the world for all that blood--despite West saying it was Kim's). I get Love interfering b/c she's a "Beautiful Person" and doesn't want to go Brittany. However, BEING a no-DQ match, why weren't the faces out there neutralizing Love and Sky?  ? Again, this seems like VERY flawed logic on the part of the booking committee. Who ever wrote this helped put it in better words. |
|
|
|
Post by frankp316 on May 12, 2008 9:23:08 GMT -6
Quit your mindless bellyaching. You don't know what you're talking about. There are two specific reasons why shaving Roxxi Laveaux's head was the correct move in this case. One is it completes her transformation to babyface and hopefully a better character. Second, they were having a hell of a time trying to get fans to boo Angelina Love despite her rather obvious heelish behaviour. Considering that she caused Roxxi to get her head shaved, if that doesn't get them to boo her, I don't know what will. Roxxi agreed to it so shut up about it. The real problem is idiot fans who think they're smart and instead of booing Angelina, they boo Russo. So this may backfire on TNA because of idiot fans trying to show how smart they are. Russo hasn't been booking the women. Scott D'Amore does and Jarrett approves everything. As usual, Russo is a convenient but misguided scapegoat.
|
|
|
|
Post by nykk on May 12, 2008 9:28:04 GMT -6
If you're not sure if it's been discussed, that's what the search function is for. In the future, it will save you from looking like a tool for asking a question that's been answered a bunch of times already. You asked a general question about why Nikki hasn't appeared at SHIMMER, which was not addressed to Dave, and was answered in the first response, which you still expressed confusion at. Neither Ryan or I even addressed the 4/26 part of your inquiry, so chill. After the SHIMMER and TNA agreement was announced, Dave said, "We can book whomever we'd like to book" but Nikki was not booked for 4/26. shimmerwomen.proboards50.com/index.cgi?board=shimmer&action=display&thread=2026#26092I don't see any posts by him after that giving an explanation until I made a thread. In the "Who should be the next Nikki Roxx?" topic prior to the taping there are some rumblings buried in the back pages where you wrote: Ever since she went to TNA, like eight months ago. She wasn't at 15/16, so the general consensus is that she must have signed an exclusive contract and is gone. If it's such common knowledge about the specifics of her TNA agreement, then explain your wording here. "General consensus" and "must have" sound like you don't really know. That's just deductive reasoning. I'm not trying to step on your toes, but if I "look like a tool" then so do you for attacking me on a subject that you don't have definitive answers on. Do you have any other prerequisite forum posts for me to read? Ah, the "I know you are, but what am I?" response. I think we're done here. |
|
|
|
Post by sonicstorm06 on May 12, 2008 9:50:57 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by magnumgecko on May 12, 2008 10:14:50 GMT -6
That's a good look for her.
Do us all a favor and stick to your guns about never watching TNA again, the less visits from Aunt Flo you have about their booking, the better.
|
|
|
|
Post by spaghettimonster on May 12, 2008 10:16:50 GMT -6
Damn you Gail Kim. How could you win this Match? You are a evil evil bad bad not fair person. This was waaay more nasty than the Montreal Screw Job. Gail Kim = Satan  |
|
|
|
Post by black1negative on May 12, 2008 10:36:03 GMT -6
i will always love NIKKI NO MATTER WHAT!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Stevie on May 12, 2008 10:55:04 GMT -6
Good God, did they use a meat cleaver or something? At least when Beefcake did it you didn't end up juicing your brains out  |
|
|
|
Post by sonicstorm06 on May 12, 2008 11:01:48 GMT -6
Yeah, almost as lame as Raven's from back in Asylum days.
|
|
