|
Post by LardWarriorELPS on Jun 25, 2009 15:38:49 GMT -6
I've only seen her in Volcano Girls 2. She was really bad in the first 2 matches, but had a fantastic match with Mickie Knuckles(but mainly because it was just them knocking the piss out of each other) but that was more than a year ago, so she's obviously improved since then.(Must I say, Daffney's technical wrestling in that tournament was off the charts) It also looks like she lost some weight. Can't wait for the dvd, to see how she and Jessica James have improved......plus I can see Daizee and that Chif/Roxx match.
|
|
|
Post by John Hyperion on Jun 25, 2009 15:47:12 GMT -6
The word you are looking for is "Zaftig" Now my yiddish is a bit rusty, but if that means succulently full figured then I think the answer might be yo! www.myspace.com/joshiqueenofqueens
|
|
barry
Hey Little Ghost
Posts: 8
|
Post by barry on Jun 25, 2009 16:40:03 GMT -6
You nailed it
|
|
|
Post by bigbiss on Jun 25, 2009 16:58:50 GMT -6
Oy!
|
|
|
Post by Jason on Jun 25, 2009 21:38:48 GMT -6
With this new gear - and the new hairstyle too - she looks the part. The one-piece means she doesn't have to fiddle with her gear mid-match, and it's a much more flattering cut which suits her body a lot more. Beforehand, what she was wearing just didn't sit right, and looked too girly for her shape. By the way, I'm not saying that her body shape is bad, but the old gear accentuated the negatives (her full name on the rear made her look bottom heavy, for example) and hid the positives (like that tattoo, which works a lot better with blue gear, instead of just looking like a pretty bruise). EDIT: I'll reserve judgement on what her wrestling was like during this tournament until I see it, but from looking at those photos, she does hook in a nice cloverleaf. Exactly as I was tring to say FreakyJason, Rachel is just a big woman. The new gear looks excellent on her.
|
|
|
Post by MC LevaMark on Jun 26, 2009 5:21:07 GMT -6
The word you are looking for is "Zaftig" Now my yiddish is a bit rusty, but if that means succulently full figured then I think the answer might be yo! www.myspace.com/joshiqueenofqueensThat's Rachel Summerlyn? Seriously? .
|
|
|
Post by Ryan on Jun 26, 2009 5:35:00 GMT -6
Well, it's Rachel Summerland.
|
|
|
Post by Starscream on Jun 26, 2009 7:32:35 GMT -6
The word you are looking for is "Zaftig" Now my yiddish is a bit rusty, but if that means succulently full figured then I think the answer might be yo! Pardon the crassness but she has that magical thing going on where the girls don't vanish. One of the perils of working out/weight loss for most women (not me because I'd rather have pecs than breasts so it doesn't bother me) is the loss of the girls first, before anything else.
|
|
|
Post by John Hyperion on Jun 26, 2009 7:42:15 GMT -6
That's Rachel Summerlyn? Seriously? . Oh I'm ernst. I'll be in my bunk.
|
|
|
Post by Ryan on Jun 26, 2009 18:38:27 GMT -6
Now my yiddish is a bit rusty, but if that means succulently full figured then I think the answer might be yo! Pardon the crassness but she has that magical thing going on where the girls don't vanish. One of the perils of working out/weight loss for most women (not me because I'd rather have pecs than breasts so it doesn't bother me) is the loss of the girls first, before anything else. Not to be more crass, but you can say the same about her rump. (which, to quote DDP, is not a bad thing . . . it's a good thing).
|
|
|
Post by Starscream on Jun 28, 2009 13:11:20 GMT -6
Pardon the crassness but she has that magical thing going on where the girls don't vanish. One of the perils of working out/weight loss for most women (not me because I'd rather have pecs than breasts so it doesn't bother me) is the loss of the girls first, before anything else. Not to be more crass, but you can say the same about her rump. (which, to quote DDP, is not a bad thing . . . it's a good thing). No, that has reduced in size.
|
|
|
Post by Digestive Ceremony on Jun 28, 2009 15:11:53 GMT -6
I feel like I'm in fifth grade again.
"Rump", really?
|
|
|
Post by Ryan on Jun 29, 2009 10:58:53 GMT -6
Not to be more crass, but you can say the same about her rump. (which, to quote DDP, is not a bad thing . . . it's a good thing). No, that has reduced in size. Fair enough. I didn't do a side-by-side comparison, but, suffice to say, it is still ample.
|
|
|
Post by Starscream on Jun 29, 2009 13:32:30 GMT -6
No, that has reduced in size. Fair enough. I didn't do a side-by-side comparison, but, suffice to say, it is still ample. To be even more crass. .. .we may have two culturally different opinions on "ample rumps".
|
|
|
Post by Ryan on Jun 29, 2009 17:07:27 GMT -6
Fair enough. I didn't do a side-by-side comparison, but, suffice to say, it is still ample. To be even more crass. .. .we may have two culturally different opinions on "ample rumps". Fair enough.
|
|