|
|
Post by NJ_ on Feb 20, 2009 17:16:35 GMT -6
Here's a less frequently asked question. What is the meaning of the member rankings we earn from our post count? Stages of happiness to depression leading to suicide or something. Many of us are "Officially Dead."  I'm sure someone told me once they're Veruca Salt song titles or references or something but I may be misremembering. Yep, they're song titles. |
|
|
|
Post by Larry Otto on Feb 20, 2009 21:06:54 GMT -6
can i have my title listed permanently as stoneface?
J
|
|
michaelwayne
Awesome
Great spirits often encounter opposition from mediocre minds.
Posts: 190
|
Post by michaelwayne on Mar 20, 2009 12:58:16 GMT -6
any chance you'll unsticky some of these old topics and just leave anything related to the most recent or upcoming events stickied? Like 3/4 of the 1st page is all stickied topics. A bit much.
|
|
|
|
Post by MC LevaMark on May 6, 2009 2:17:10 GMT -6
I've brought it up in other threads, though I don't believe that a truly definitive answer has been posted, and certainly not by the one person who would know. On nearly every DVD volume through Year One, a good portion of Year Two, and sparingly if at all during Year Three, it has been mentioned on commentary that Shimmer wrestlers must win in order to maintain their roster spot or risk being "benched" as it has been referred to. This spawns a few questions that I think other viewers besides myself might be curious about. 1. How many losses warrant a wrestler being benched? 2. For how many volumes does the benching last? 3. Does this rule affect the entire roster as it appears that there have been a number of exceptions to the rule(i.e. Lacey, Lorelei Lee, Amber O'Neal) who conceivably should have been benched due to a lack of winning but, somehow avoided it? If the entire roster is affected by this rule, what is the explanation behind the "exeptions"? 4. Why has there not been a full or even partial explanation of this rule on this forum in the last three years as it seems like something that requires a little more explaining than that which has been given in commentary on the DVD's? Inquiring minds want to know.  |
|
|
|
Post by nemesis on Jun 1, 2009 5:54:47 GMT -6
I have another little question, according to an agreement, TNA Knockouts can't appear on Shimmer DVDs, however i found out Amazing Kong, Melissa and many girls from TNA are appearing on DVDs. Did TNA made an agreement with Shimmer
|
|
|
|
Post by Woo on Jun 1, 2009 10:58:29 GMT -6
This was answered elsewhere in this topic. The agreement was that TNA talent could not appear on any future retail versions of Shimmer DVD's, but since there aren't going to be anymore retail versions atm it's a moo point.
If that's wrong someone will correct me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stevie on Jun 1, 2009 11:19:55 GMT -6
This was answered elsewhere in this topic. The agreement was that TNA talent could not appear on any future retail versions of Shimmer DVD's, but since there aren't going to be anymore retail versions atm it's a moo point. As in, a point made by cows? ;D Sorry, you're quite correct as far as I know but I just couldn't resist. |
|
|
|
Post by NJ_ on Jun 1, 2009 11:45:33 GMT -6
This was answered elsewhere in this topic. The agreement was that TNA talent could not appear on any future retail versions of Shimmer DVD's, but since there aren't going to be anymore retail versions atm it's a moo point. If that's wrong someone will correct me. You got it and the reason why there won't be anymore retail DVDs is due to the store cutbacks at Worst Buy and other places. |
|
|
|
Post by Woo on Jun 1, 2009 15:46:05 GMT -6
This was answered elsewhere in this topic. The agreement was that TNA talent could not appear on any future retail versions of Shimmer DVD's, but since there aren't going to be anymore retail versions atm it's a moo point. As in, a point made by cows? ;D Sorry, you're quite correct as far as I know but I just couldn't resist. Joey from Friends: "Moo point. It's like a cow's opinion- it doesn't matter." Did you get the reference or just come up with that Stevie? Either way hats off to you. |
|
|
|
Post by Stevie on Jun 2, 2009 12:32:31 GMT -6
As in, a point made by cows? ;D Sorry, you're quite correct as far as I know but I just couldn't resist. Joey from Friends: "Moo point. It's like a cow's opinion- it doesn't matter." Did you get the reference or just come up with that Stevie? Either way hats off to you. Yeah I got the ref, I actually thought I was quoting Chandler or Joey or whoever it was from said episode, but maybe I was just paraphrasing. |
|
|
|
Post by johnnywadd on Jun 20, 2009 7:40:35 GMT -6
Something i wondered from time to time. How does one get a warning level of 75% , 97 % , not that i'm looking to join them in detention.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stevie on Jun 20, 2009 13:02:25 GMT -6
I did wonder what exactly Jon and Shanti did to jump to 97% out of the blue, especially since I'm pretty sure I remember both having clean records when I went to bed the night before...
|
|
|
|
Post by freaky on Jun 21, 2009 0:46:58 GMT -6
Something i wondered from time to time. How does one get a warning level of 75% , 97 % , not that i'm looking to join them in detention. Be an arse. That usually works. |
|
|
|
Post by nykk on Jun 21, 2009 3:23:51 GMT -6
I'm not sure what the criteria is for warnings. There have been times I've made posts and I thought for sure I would have a warning the next time I was here, but here I am clean as a whistle (and sharp as a thistle).
|
|
|
|
Post by savior on Jun 21, 2009 22:29:42 GMT -6
Dave has changed his hair color now to match LuFisto. This stuff just keeps getting more interesting. Does he dye it to match his outfits accordingly? |
|
